Re: (FT) Re: Simple Sensors III

>I think the ranges are too great.  What's the point of a Bogey if
>by the time ships got within firing range you knew what is or isn't
>a false ship reading?

This was created so the average tabletop game could ignore sensors if
the
wanted, yet would still provide a way for larger battles (or system
scale
stuff) to have some pre-combat maneuvering.

>What happened to the uncertainty part of the More Thrust chart?
>Does "All" include the current damage?  That would be very important
>to know if all FCs were damaged, the Bridge was still
>out from a critical hit, or that the Main Drive was completely
>knocked out for salvo missile placement or fighter movement.

"All" would include the original values only (like result; MT pp 6)

>How many scans can be done in a turn?

Active or passive sensors affect all ships within range. Thus you would
not
scan a single ship.

Schoon