DPU and Fatalism Was Re: Gauss Weapons

>From: Popeyesays@AOL.COM
>Reply-To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
>To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
>Subject: Re: Gauss Weapons
>Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 11:30:44 EDT
>
>>
>AT which point he will tie up medics, transportation people, hospital
>facilities, graves and registration people and expend a large portion
of 
>cash
>to support his last days - a "wounded" individual is always more
expense 
>than
>a KIA to his war effort.

This is assuming that he suffers a wound which disables him immediately,

then begins the insidious work of killing him.	But in a combat
situation, 
how many soldiers would sustain wounds that under normal circumstances
would 
be mere flesh wounds, were it not for the Plutonium poisoning?	Now you
face 
an enemy who knows he is going to die, yet can still fight.  He has no 
reason to fear death, because it's already at the door.  You can't keep
his 
head down with supression fire, because he WANTS to be shot in the head
- 
he's bent on two things, revenge and a quicker death tan the one you've 
already sentenced him to.  He will be relentless, fearless, and the only
way 
to stop him is to bring him down - you can't make him run from the one
thing 
he would most welcome.	Forget Dead Man Walking - this is Dead Man
Killing.

Brian Bilderback
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com