Re: Lasers can't be defended against?
From: John Leary <john_t_leary@p...>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 23:21:05 -0700
Subject: Re: Lasers can't be defended against?
Popeyesays@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 4/24/00 10:40:12 PM Central Daylight Time,
> john_t_leary@pronetusa.net writes:
>
> <<
> FLIR is 'F orward L ooking I nfra- R ed', no 'radar'involved.
> I.E. it is a passive system.
> Which I said
Yes, I noticed your communication, later in the message list.
Sometimes, I think that I am always the last one to post anything!
:-)
Bye for now,
John L.