RE: [DS] Specialist Elements

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John M. Atkinson [SMTP:john.m.atkinson@erols.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2000 11:00 AM
> To:	gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject:	Re: [DS] Specialist Elements
> 
> 
> 
> Michael Sarno wrote:
> > 
> > "Glover, Owen" wrote:
> > 
> > > The GMS/L i would imagine as not a suitable weapon for
PA.....remember
> > > in SG that PA carry GMS/P and this is one of those examples where
the
> > > crosover between DS and SG isn't seemless. Someone recently
proposed
> > > GMS/P stats for DS...I personally don't see a problem with Mike in
his
> > > background utilising them both in the same team at relevant costs
> > > though.
> > 
> >	I have no problem with going with the GMS/P for my PA troops.  I
> > missed the post regarding GMS/P stats for DS.  I searched the
archives,
> > but the most recent message for "GMS/P" came back as April 1999. 
Does
> > anybody have the post handy or perhaps the date of the post? 
Thanks.
> 
> No.  But since I think he's talking about something I said, I
suggested
> 2 chits, validity as per IAVR, vulnerable to PDS and ECM like regular
> GMS.	12" range.  Points +10/+15/+20 for B/E/S.
> 
> John
-----End Original Message-----

And my suggestion was normal GMS validity. ECM/PDS as normal, 1 chit vs.
armor, 3 chits vs infantry, 16" range, limited ammo (like artillery).
Cost
is 1/2 GMS/L
-----
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net
http://members.xoom.com/rlyehable/ds2/	   
-----