Re: Underwater Rules - SG (long)

The water would react violently, the plasma would lose energy, thus
effective range(all though realistically, as long as it's still in the
plasma state it's still effective). Anyway, plasma would superheat the
water
as soon as it touched it, so it would continue on it's marry way leaving
a
trail of superheated steam and possibly some vacuum behind it.

Jade Tseng

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@hotmail.com>
To: <gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2000 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: Underwater Rules - SG (long)

> I was thinking you could count plasma weapons as suicide weapons -
wouldn't
> they react violently with the water, and damned too close to the end
of
the
> barrel from which they had been fired? I could be wrong, I'm sure I'll
know
> soon if I am.
>
> Brian B
>
>
>
> >From: "Conchart@geotec.net" <conchart@geotec.net>
> >Reply-To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> >To: <gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>
> >Subject: Re: Underwater Rules - SG (long)
> >Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 17:29:24 -0500
> >
> >I just had to ask, does any one else think fighting under water
against
> >someone using plasma or laser weapons would be scary as hell? I mean,
can
> >you imagine the water disturbances, hissing and crackling, just plain
> >fearful sight such weapons would have in the lurid deep? Maybe you
should
> >count infantry plasma guns as terror weapons while under water, I
cant
> >think
> >how to represent this effect anywhere else, but I thought I'd mention
it.
> >
> >Jade Tseng
> >
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>