Prev: Re: Active vs Passive Next: [FT] Questions from a new-ish-bee

RE: Active vs Passive

From: Chris DeBoe <ChrisD@j...>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 15:16:25 -0400
Subject: RE: Active vs Passive

I said:
>> Why bother?	There's no water to interfere with your comm, so just
send a
 message laser to your corvettes on either flank and get them to
triangulate.

Popeyes replied:
I was assuming a single ship or sensor picket trying to pin point a
bogey - 
sorry if I was not clear.

Oh, you were clear--my point was, it's worth it to spend 30 points or
whatever so you can triangulate NOW and without burning thrust.  CTs and
SCs
weren't originally designed to be missile bait.


Prev: Re: Active vs Passive Next: [FT] Questions from a new-ish-bee