Re: The Problem with EW

On 12-Apr-00 at 22:50, Sean Bayan Schoonmaker (schoon@aimnet.com) wrote:
> >By that logic we should leave ECM out and never look at new systems.
> >All that is required is for FB3 and or FT 3rd Ed to give each
> >group a few Scout type designs.  What we are discussing here is
> >(hopefully) finding a way that works easily with FT that can go
> >in FB3 or FT 3rd or give Mr. GZG an idea that lets him set something
> >up for these systems.  Personally, I liked the ping-pong balls.  I
> >have some at home set to go on my bases.
> 
> I've always felt that ECM and ECCM, along with the rest of EW, should
> simply be combined into one system: Electronics (or whatever you want
to
> call it).
> 
> Schoon

I've been leaning that way myself.  It still leaves the question "What
can you do with it?"

Roger