Re: MT missiles and point costs

On 10-Apr-00 at 15:27, Oerjan Ohlson (oerjan.ohlson@telia.com) wrote:
> Roger Books wrote:
> 
> >>2) Roughly how big would you think the "particular design" in
> question
> >>is to get the above results (on average 14% of the systems knocked
> >>down by one nuclear MT missile, 19% by an EMP missile)? 
> > 
> >Stastics pop quiz. :)
> 
> <g> If I had wanted to start a pop quiz, I would've asked for the
exact
> design I'm thinking of - though the above data isn't enough to
> determine that, since there are two ships in FB1 which satisfies it
:-7
> 

Only two with the same hull+armour that meet your requirements?  I would
have expected more.

I am a bit surpised though about how you pull a 19% for an EMP missile,
you have to assume a distribution of ships with varying levels of
shields.  Even if you use only fleetbook ships nobody is going to
choose exactly one of each.

Roger