Prev: Alternate Vehicle Design Philosophy Next: Re: Alternate Vehicle Design Philosophy

Re: Vehicle Design Philosophy

From: "Oerjan Ohlson" <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 21:37:11 +0200
Subject: Re: Vehicle Design Philosophy

Brian Bilderback wrote:

>I will comment more on this later as time allows. For now, let me say
>this:	
>If this design philosphy [lightly armoured and very fast] becomes
canon, >you can bet that human artillerymen are going to enjoy a
significant rise >in their popularity amongst the rest of the
service....

If they manage to hit their target, sure. The problem is that the
target usually won't be where the grenades fall (in real life due to
the tanks moving at very high speeds, in DSII due to the tanks getting
a warning "ranging shot" before the real salvo arrives unless the
artillery are firing over open sights). 

Furthermore, in real life both stealth/ECM and point defence works
against guided or self-guiding AT artillery munitions - only so-so at
the moment, but it won't take long before they work far too well for my
taste. They should in DSII as well, though at the moment they don't.

Regards,

Oerjan Ohlson
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com

"Life is like a sewer.
  What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
- Hen3ry

Prev: Alternate Vehicle Design Philosophy Next: Re: Alternate Vehicle Design Philosophy