Re: SG2 vs DS2 vs FT
From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 14:09:19 PST
Subject: Re: SG2 vs DS2 vs FT
Actually, I've come up with a favorite design for a HBT, let's see what
people think:
Class 5 Fast Tracked (I went with Fast Tracked over Grav or Hover for
two
reasons: first, it offsets the high price of the rest of the gear on the
tank, and second, it can traverse lightly wooded ares, it seems a bit
more
rugged design.)
FGP, Armor 5A, 4 levels of stealth, Superior ECM, Superior targeting,
Backup
Systems, Amphibious.
Main Weapon: MDC 5
Secondary Weapon: Coazial DFFG 2 (mainly for anti-personnel use at
range)
Other systems: Superior PDS, 2 APSW's (1 Free, 1 paid for), APFC
Brian Bilderback
----Original Message Follows----
From: Aaron Teske <ateske@HICom.net>
Reply-To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: Re: SG2 vs DS2 vs FT
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 09:19:46 -0500
Unfortunately, that variation is a
bit harder to carry over into DSII vehicles, but one might nation may
favor
size 2-3 vehicles with the occational size 4, while another uses size 5
almost exclusively, each a fortress in it's own right... not that I've
designed any of these, just tossing off ideas.
Aaron Teske
ateske@HICom.net
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com