Prev: Re: SMs revisited Next: Re: PDS vs. IAVR/LAW/SMAW/etc.

RE: was: PDS vs. IAVR/LAW/SMAW/etc.

From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 16:57:53 PST
Subject: RE: was: PDS vs. IAVR/LAW/SMAW/etc.

I completely overlooked this point, thanks.

----Original Message Follows----
From: "Bell, Brian K" <Brian_Bell@dscc.dla.mil>
Reply-To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
To: "'gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU'" <gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: RE: was: PDS vs. IAVR/LAW/SMAW/etc.
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 07:14:16 -0500

And remember that the diminishing effect due to multiple missiles is a
per-attacking-unit penalty. If unit A fires 3 missiles at unit X,
protected
by superior ADS, the ADS gets to roll a d6 for each missile. If then
unit B
fires 2 missiles at unit X, still protected by the superior ADS, the ADS
get
to roll a d8 for each missile.

-----
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net
http://members.xoom.com/rlyehable/ds2/
-----

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Prev: Re: SMs revisited Next: Re: PDS vs. IAVR/LAW/SMAW/etc.