Re: Alternate history[Here's my Timeline](long)

The Indian issue has been hashed out.  As for the "Force" and "Taken"
part, 
that was inferred, not intentionlly implied.  "Given" to them means 
"Returned willingly".

As for the US being broken up by the permission of the people, that does

happen in my VERY unofficial timeline, though by plebiscite, not by
civil 
war. Granted, small local conflicts break out as everyone tries to
decide 
who gets what, but there is no continent-wide conflagration.

Brian B

----Original Message Follows----
From: John Leary <john_t_leary@pronetusa.net>

      The reference to the army and weapons was a roundabout way of
saying that
the concepts of 'force', 'take', and 'give to' with reguard to the USA
are
not really viable.   The only way the USA can be broken up/controlled is
with
the permission of the people.

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com