Re: Alternate history

Anybody mind if I did post my timeline?

    Jason
----- Original Message -----
From: <BDShatswell@aol.com>
To: <gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Alternate history

> Hello Roger and everyone,
>
> When Roger brought up the subject, I went to updating my timeline
page.  I
> changed the wording somewhat and inserted a link Brian's Expanded GZG
History
> page.
>
> I still don't have any US fleet ships on the page as yet.  My vision
of
the
> US fleet carriers is very similar to Richard's.  Lots of fighters and
PDS,
> various load-outs, and an escort group to make ya shiver.  The
carriers
stay
> as far away from the combat as possible.
>
> Bill Shatswell
>
> In a message dated 02/16/2000 12:51:46 PM Central Standard Time,
> books@mail.state.fl.us writes:
>
> > The one I was looking for was by Bill , the URL is:
> >
> >  http://members.xoom.com/bstraycat/ft/timeline.htm
> >
> >  Looks good to me.	One thing about the US Fleet that both Bill
(bstraycat)
> > and
> >  Richard (who works for DIA) suggested is that the US Fleet would
> >  be a carrier based fleet.	Richards suggestion was something
similar
> >  to a Jean D'arc but with NO offensive weaponry and 8-10 fighter
> >  squadrons.  Bill suggests the US fleet will be based around
carriers
> >  and SCS type ships.
>