Prev: RE: Was re: RFACS but diverging into philosophic ramblings about future tech... Next: Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor

RE: SG II: Flame vs. armor

From: "Glover, Owen" <oglover@m...>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 11:07:27 +1000
Subject: RE: SG II: Flame vs. armor

Hmm, the US Army may not have Flame Throwers as such but most armies do
have
incendiary weapons; White Phos and similar.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cleats Balentine [mailto:kevinbalentine@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2000 9:52 AM
> To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject: Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor
> 
> 
> What about the effects of a World War II-era Crocodile
> (A Brit tank with a flame thrower) on modern armor?
> Would it have any shot of getting either a minor or
> major impact (to put it in SG II terms) on a modern
> AFV?
> 
> An acquaitance of mine said the US currently has no
> flame throwing weapons in their TO&Es. Can anyone
> confirm or deny the validity of that report?
> 
> --- Ryan M Gill <monty@arcadia.turner.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 adrian.johnson@sympatico.ca
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Modern AFV's have air intakes and vents for their
> > engines... if you dumped
> > > a bottle of burning fuel into one, it might do
> > *something*.
> > 
> > Many that have been designed for IS work have been
> > getting flame 
> > resistant components on the engine
> > (Nomes/metal/asbestos) fittings and 
> > wireing. This makes the molotov cocktail less than
> > useful.
> > 
> > > Unless the AFV has an on-boar fire supression
> > system in the engine bay.
> > 
> > The fire supression system may help to a degree if
> > there is some medium 
> > to minor damage, if a hellfire missile strikes the
> > turret, I doubt there 
> > is much to be gained from the largest bottle of
> > Halon..
> > 
> > 
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > - Ryan Montieth Gill      NRA / DoD# 0780 (Smug #1)
> > / AMA / SOHC -
> > - ryan.gill@turner.com	I speak not for CNN, nor
> > they for me -
> > - rmgill@mindspring.com		
> > www.mindspring.com/~rmgill/ -
> > - '85 Honda CB700S	-  '72 Honda CB750K  - '76 Chevy
> > MonteCarlo	-
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -  No more limits on the 2nd amendment. Enforce the
> > extant laws  -
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > 
> > 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com
> 


Prev: RE: Was re: RFACS but diverging into philosophic ramblings about future tech... Next: Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor