Re: DSII Cavalry

Since I've already added WAY more than most people want to hear to the 
cavalry debate, I may as well run with it.  Bear in mind ground scale.
I'm 
sure within that are under the element's base, there's plenty of room to

keep the horsies out of the way. Furthermore, most military cavalry
mounts, 
throughout the centuries, were better trained to not panic under fire
than 
regular horses. Not to mention, with the assumed advances in personal
body 
armor protection, I'm sure they could make the horses as well-protected
as 
the men with little addition to the weight it bears.

Another related question: In the rulebook, we're told to feel free to
try a 
mounted cavalry charge into close combat. Has anyone ever worked on 
modifiers for that? It has to be pretty hairy for both sides involved...

Brian B

----Original Message Follows----
From: Popeyesays@aol.com
Reply-To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: Re: DSII Cavalry
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 15:58:33 EST

In a message dated 2/15/00 2:35:16 PM Central Standard Time,
bobbymock@juno.com writes:

<< Whatever happened to the convenient tie up poles at the saloon? >>

GEnerally speaking most mounts don't care much for combat - and
convenient
tie-up posts are also convenient UN-tie up posts.

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com