Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor
From: Ryan M Gill <monty@a...>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 18:34:45 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 adrian.johnson@sympatico.ca wrote:
> Modern AFV's have air intakes and vents for their engines... if you
dumped
> a bottle of burning fuel into one, it might do *something*.
Many that have been designed for IS work have been getting flame
resistant components on the engine (Nomes/metal/asbestos) fittings and
wireing. This makes the molotov cocktail less than useful.
> Unless the AFV has an on-boar fire supression system in the engine
bay.
The fire supression system may help to a degree if there is some medium
to minor damage, if a hellfire missile strikes the turret, I doubt there
is much to be gained from the largest bottle of Halon..
------------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill NRA / DoD# 0780 (Smug #1) / AMA / SOHC -
- ryan.gill@turner.com I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
- rmgill@mindspring.com www.mindspring.com/~rmgill/ -
- '85 Honda CB700S - '72 Honda CB750K - '76 Chevy MonteCarlo -
------------------------------------------------------------------
- No more limits on the 2nd amendment. Enforce the extant laws -
------------------------------------------------------------------