Prev: RE: Was re: RFACS but diverging into philosophic ramblings about future tech... Next: Re: DSII motorcycles/grav bikes

Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor

From: Ryan M Gill <monty@a...>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 18:34:45 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: SG II: Flame vs. armor

On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 adrian.johnson@sympatico.ca wrote:

> Modern AFV's have air intakes and vents for their engines... if you
dumped
> a bottle of burning fuel into one, it might do *something*.

Many that have been designed for IS work have been getting flame 
resistant components on the engine (Nomes/metal/asbestos) fittings and 
wireing. This makes the molotov cocktail less than useful.

> Unless the AFV has an on-boar fire supression system in the engine
bay.

The fire supression system may help to a degree if there is some medium 
to minor damage, if a hellfire missile strikes the turret, I doubt there

is much to be gained from the largest bottle of Halon..

------------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill	  NRA / DoD# 0780 (Smug #1) / AMA / SOHC -
- ryan.gill@turner.com	    I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
- rmgill@mindspring.com 	     www.mindspring.com/~rmgill/ -
- '85 Honda CB700S  -  '72 Honda CB750K  - '76 Chevy MonteCarlo  -
------------------------------------------------------------------
-  No more limits on the 2nd amendment. Enforce the extant laws  -
------------------------------------------------------------------ 

Prev: RE: Was re: RFACS but diverging into philosophic ramblings about future tech... Next: Re: DSII motorcycles/grav bikes