Re: RFACS

This also has it's merits.  The only problem is, getting your opponent
to 
admit how close his units are together....

Brian Bilderback

----Original Message Follows----
From: "Andrew Martin" <Al.Bri@xtra.co.nz>
Reply-To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
To: <gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: Re: RFACS
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 14:24:36 +1300

Perhaps a better option is to say that vehicles or infantry elements
that
are specified as being adjacent to each other (examples: convoy of
vehicles,
infantry marching, infantry using their APC or a building as cover, and
so
on), can be attacked by "strafing" from a vehicle or aerospace vehicle.
Each
element draws chits according to the weapon shooting at them. Very much
like
artillery.

Because the forces are closer together than the physical position on the
table suggests, a strafing run can more easily affect all targets.

Note this also applies to vehicles armed with RFACs and similar.

Optionally, for a less lethal situation, reduce damage chits by one or
reduce validity by one step, eg from RED and YELLOW to just RED, from
RED to
YELLOW only, and so on.

Morale: Keep dispersed!

Andrew Martin
ICQ: 26227169
http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
-><-

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com