Re: Tank vision systems
From: Popeyesays@a...
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 18:11:30 EST
Subject: Re: Tank vision systems
In a message dated 2/4/00 5:01:46 PM Central Standard Time,
laserlight@quixnet.net writes:
<< In any event, we are NOT talking about TODAY--at least the
Pro-Sensors side is not--we're talking about Two Hundred Years
From Now. If you have good sensors--Virtual Reality here!--why
in heaven's name would you want to put your head out of the
tank? There's nothing mystical about the Mk 1 Eyeball. Sure,
you can blind any other sensor if you put your mind to it--so
what? A quick hit with a laser will blind your tanker just as
thoroughly. >>
Whichs is why any soldier on the field will probably be wearing some
verion
of your "VR" head gear any way - but his option will still be to look
with
his eyes in a visiual spectrum - and the helmet will protect his eyes or
there will be nothing BUT blind people on a future battlefield.
There is nothing miraculouos about the eyeball - but it is more reliable
than
any electronic component that has been mentioned up to now - and
besides
the point of view I and the few who can lay some claim to knowing
something
about tank operations - is that the electronics increase your
information
processing and so does your eye and brain - BOTH are going to be
necessary
and one without the other is BAD - BUT if you can only have one, (again
barring a direct neural interface) then the eyeball (MkI) is the one I
would
choose to have.