Prev: Apologies: Re: Tanks vs. APCs Next: Re: [FT] Heavy Beams 2nd Draft

re: [FT] Heavy Beams 2nd Draft

From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 07:27:08 -0800
Subject: re: [FT] Heavy Beams 2nd Draft

>why did the class 3 BPS jump to 48 when there seems to be a 3 x mass =
cost
>proportion for the others?  shouldn't it be 36, or did i miss
something?

Mistake alert! - it should be 36!

Schoon

Prev: Apologies: Re: Tanks vs. APCs Next: Re: [FT] Heavy Beams 2nd Draft