re: [FT] Heavy Beams 2nd Draft
From: "David Reeves" <davidar@n...>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2000 09:06:56 -0500
Subject: re: [FT] Heavy Beams 2nd Draft
schoon,
overall, i like it! i have a few questions and suggestions below.
> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 18:33:31 -0800
> From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@aimnet.com>
> Subject: [FT] Heavy Beams 2nd Draft
>
[snip]
> Beam Power System:
> Class 1 4 MASS 12 POINT COST
> Class 2 8 MASS 24 POINT COST
> Class 3 12 MASS 48 POINT COST
>
why did the class 3 BPS jump to 48 when there seems to be a 3 x mass =
cost
proportion for the others? shouldn't it be 36, or did i miss something?
[snip]
>
> Beam Emitter:
> Class 1 1 MASS 3 POINT COST
> Class 2 2 MASS 6 POINT COST
> Class 3 3 MASS 9 POINT COST
>
> More comments? More suggestions?
i assume it is possible for a class 3 BE, for example to output a beam
of 1, 2
OR 3 EP?
i also like michael's ideas on adding +1 mass for: each extra arc, +3"
range,
+2 damage, anti-fighter (sweeping). (although i personally would only
say +1
damage for 1 mass, since
this is a per die rating.) these features allow one to create the
variety of
beam weapons
seen in B5 and B5 Wars.
dave