RE: M113 APC?

Sounds about right; although I'd probably veer to Front Armour of Class1
as
well. The M113 whilst being a worthy work-horse only provides limited
protection against close ranged small arms fire.

On another note, one of the conveners at Cancon was talking about using
modified SGII rules to do a big WWII demo game for 2001 simply because
of
the command and control and game flow! Good to see more support for the
game
from the historical gamers.

Owen G

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Sarno [mailto:msarno@ptdprolog.net]
> Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2000 1:04 PM
> To: Ground Zero Games Mailing List
> Subject: M113 APC?
> 
> 
>     I'm working on the vehicle data cards for my SGII scenario at Cold
> Wars.  It is an historical scenario set in Vietnam.  I'm 
> trying to work
> out the stats for the M113 APC.  I'm thinking that I could 
> make the M113
> a size 2 vehicle.  The M113 carried 9 passengers and had 1 360 mounted
> HMG.	A size 2 vehicle could carry up to 10 and gets the 
> "free" support
> weapon.  This would also give front armor of class 2 and side and read
> armor of class 1.  Does this sound right?  Thanks for any help.
> 
> -Mike
> 
> 
> --
> Michael Sarno
> 
http://vietnam.isonfire.com
Check out the Charlie Company Discussion Group:
Info, resources, and links for RAFM's miniatures
skirmish wargame of infantry combat in Vietnam 1965-1972

"The world has no room for cowards.
 We must all be ready to toil, to suffer, to die.
 And yours is no less noble because no drum beats
 before you when you go out in your daily battlefields.
 And no crowds shout about your coming when you
 return from your daily victory or defeat."
 -Robert Louis Stevenson