Prev: Re: [FT] How screens work (was Re: UNSC designs) Next: Re: [FT] fleet colour schemes (picts wanted) (long)

RE: Heavy Fighter Technology

From: Ryan M Gill <monty@a...>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 18:23:56 -0500 (EST)
Subject: RE: Heavy Fighter Technology

On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Robertson, Brendan wrote:

> Maximum armour for all aerospace fighters is 3 or 1 less than the size
class
> (whichever is less) under Dirtside/Stargrunt vehicle construction.

Ahh, good point. Then allowing an increase of one armour point would
also 
illustrate the fighter's "heavieness" would it not?

------------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill	  NRA / DoD# 0780 (Smug #1) / AMA / SOHC -
- ryan.gill@turner.com	    I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
- rmgill@mindspring.com 	     www.mindspring.com/~rmgill/ -
- '85 Honda CB700S  -  '72 Honda CB750K  - '76 Chevy MonteCarlo  -
------------------------------------------------------------------

Prev: Re: [FT] How screens work (was Re: UNSC designs) Next: Re: [FT] fleet colour schemes (picts wanted) (long)