Prev: RE: GEVs Next: Re: GEVs

RE: Arty

From: Ryan M Gill <monty@a...>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 12:23:55 -0500 (EST)
Subject: RE: Arty

On Fri, 3 Dec 1999, Scott Uecker wrote:

> Not sure what you mean by obsolete.  The US Marines used them during
the
> Gulf.  They were and still would be more accurate than any other
artillery
> piece we had/have (including the M198).  Good piece of gear.	The only
> reasons we got rid of them was the cost of maintaining SP's and their
sheer
> weight made them difficult to embark/deploy.

It was also the choice means of delivering the Artillery launched nuke 
rounds in US use. Not that we ever used them. 

Also note that during Vietnam we had a 175mm sp gun 3 variants of the 
M110 203mm and several 105mm guns sp and towed. 

> or 1 Marine by hand....

You Jar^h^h^hMarines always doing things by hand when an auto loader 
could do it.  Not that we civies would ever pay for the Marines to have 
an autolading SP gun...:< Damn politicoes. Still you guys do a bang up 
job with what you get. 

------------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill	  NRA / DoD# 0780 (Smug #1) / AMA / SOHC -
- ryan.gill@turner.com	    I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
- rmgill@mindspring.com 	     www.mindspring.com/~rmgill/ -
- '85 Honda CB700S  -  '72 Honda CB750K  - '76 Chevy MonteCarlo  -
------------------------------------------------------------------

Prev: RE: GEVs Next: Re: GEVs