Re: DS2/SG2 artillery
From: Matthew Seidl <seidl@v...>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 09:52:35 -0700
Subject: Re: DS2/SG2 artillery
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999 11:21:53 -0500 (EST), Roger Books writes:
>On 29-Nov-99 at 11:19, Ryan M Gill (monty@arcadia.turner.com) wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Los wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > I still don't get the assumption that something fired form 200
miles
>> > (ortillery) up will be more accurate (or cost effective) than
something
>> > fired from 10 miles away (SP arty) from the ground. I can't make
that
>> > leap of faith very easily since ground based fire technology wion't
be
>> > moving forward just as well as space-based fire control.
>>
>> It may not be as acurrate, but it will have a much longer flight
time.
>> You wanna wait 40 minutes for a firemission to land fromthe time you
>> request it?
>
>My question is why would your ortillery fire from 200 miles away. We
>have what, about 3 miles of atmosphere? That space based artillery
>could be 5 miles away. As for flight times, both are going to be
>insignificant.
>
We've got a lot more atmosphere than that. Planes routinely fly at
37,000 feet (~7 miles up). Geo sync orbit is at 22,236 miles. A lot
higher than 200.
-=- Matthew L. Seidl email: seidl@cs.colorado.edu
=-=
=-= Graduate Student Project . . . What Project?
-=-
-=- http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~seidl/Home.html -Morrow Quotes
=-=
=-= http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~seidl/lawsuit
-=-