GMS Air

-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Johnson <ajohnson@idirect.com>
To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU <gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 2:48 AM
Subject: Re: Dirtside Rules Question

>My point is that if we can have a system like this NOW, is it not
>reasonable to think that a GMS system 150 years from now will be able
to
>take on both tanks and aircraft?  Why not simply state that your GMS
>systems can take on both air and ground targets.  If you don't like the
>idea that they will be equally effective against both types of targets,
how
>about designating them with a primary specialty ie:  GMS/H-AT for
primarily
>anti-tank, and GMS/H-AA for primarily anti-air.  They would operate at
full
>effectiveness against their primary target type, and less effectively
>against the other type.  The less-effectively part could be
accomplished by
>either reducing their damage potential, or reducing their hit potential
-
>or maybe both.

    I submitted this idea over a year ago.  Look in the Archives for my
expanded weapons list including GMS/Air systems.