Re: [increasingly OT] How much is a kT? (and some RG stuff)
From: "Oerjan Ohlson" <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 10:03:31 +0200
Subject: Re: [increasingly OT] How much is a kT? (and some RG stuff)
Second try - sorry if this shows up twice:
Thanks for the kTon clarifications :-) The pure *metric* system is on
its way out in Europe, though - the SI system is currently "in", and it
doesn't use calories :-/
Kent Nordstrom wrote:
> 1kg projectiles going at 2x10^6 m/s (a bit less than 0.01c)
> would have 1kT of kinetic energy. If 1" is a million km, it'd take
around 2
> minutes for a projectile to get to max range of 30". Well, you're
only
> hitting on a "6" anyhow,
But you're only hitting on a 2+ at range 0-6, when you *should* be
hitting on a D6 roll of -100 or something like that.
For a given targetting computer, number of slugs and slug velocity, the
hit probability depends on the distance to the target to the -4th power
(ie, if the distance to the target is doubled, your hit rate drops to
1/16th of what it used to be) and the target's thrust rating as the
-2nd power, so you'd only have 25% as high a chance to hit a thrust-4
ships as you would a thrust-2 one :-/
> Yet another side note: you'd want the
> projectiles to be very precisely machined... at least massing very
close
> to some standard amount.
Since we can manage that today - not cheaply, but we can - I don't
think that's a very big problem :-/
Regards,
Oerjan Ohlson
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com
"Life is like a sewer.
What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
- Hen3ry