RE: FTL Jumps and making it tricky...
From: "Bell, Brian K" <Brian_Bell@d...>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 07:53:57 -0400
Subject: RE: FTL Jumps and making it tricky...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan White [SMTP:Jonw@nessie.mcc.ac.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 6:07 AM
> To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject: Re: FTL Jumps and making it tricky...
>
> Ah, but the detection apparatus would also have to work at FTL,
otherwise
> there
> wouldn't be much point would there? You couldn't use any 'standard' em
or
> radiation signature...
>
I always used the PSB of tachyons escaping the jump point/area
for
detection. This should give some warning.
For jump points/areas I have always used one of two methods:
1) The jump point is above/below the stellar pole at a sizeable
distance. This would allow for ships near the important worlds time to
meet
the incomming force away from the property they protect.
2) The jump area is a hollow sphere about 1/2 way to the Oort
Cloud
and about 1au in width. Again, this allows ships to be stationed near
the
important real estate, but have time to travel out for battle.
-----
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net
http://fly.to/fullthrust
-----