RE: [FT] Fleet Book ship construction sheet v0.4
From: "Brian Bell" <bkb@b...>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 17:43:13 -0400
Subject: RE: [FT] Fleet Book ship construction sheet v0.4
Jared Noble confirmed today (in a very gracious way) that Laserlight was
correct.
He sends greetings to the GZG-L list and looks forward to the time that
he
can rejoin the list.
---
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net <mailto:bkb@beol.net>
http://members.xoom.com/rlyehable/
---
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[mailto:owner-gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of Brian Bell
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 1999 20:58
To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: RE: [FT] Fleet Book ship construction sheet v0.4
Ahhh.
Usage error on my part.
---
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net <mailto:bkb@beol.net>
http://members.xoom.com/rlyehable/
---
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[mailto:owner-gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of Laserlight
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 1999 20:53
To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: Re: [FT] Fleet Book ship construction sheet v0.4
>FYI,
>To anyone who is using the Fleet Book ship construction sheet v0.4
(Excel
>spreadsheet) by Jared Noble:
>I have found an error in the spreadsheet. On any weapon with a choice
of
>number of arcs (Class 2+, Pulse Torpedo, etc.), the spreadsheet does
not
>multiply the mass for extra arcs by the number of weapons.
I believe you're supposed to put in the _total_ number of extra arcs,
e.g. 2
Beam-3's with 1 extra arc each means you put in 2, not 1. I grant you,
it's
not obvious.