Re: M-16 Replacement
From: ScottSaylo@a...
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 23:41:33 EDT
Subject: Re: M-16 Replacement
In a message dated 7/19/99 8:11:21 PM Central Daylight Time,
aebrain@dynamite.com.au writes:
<<
It also has AFAIK a Thermal Imager/Sight inferior to that on the latest
version of the venerable M60A3(PI). Probably it's biggest drawback.
Still a good weapons system though.
>>
Not to mention there is no hatch to open in the bottom out of which to
take a
leak! A serious drawback to any tanker laden to his last plimsoll
marker. But
in a combat situation you'll probably live a lot longer in the Abrams
than in
the Patton however (Product Improved) it might be.