Re: [OFFICIAL] FMA range thoughts....
From: ScottSaylo@a...
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:52:37 EDT
Subject: Re: [OFFICIAL] FMA range thoughts....
In a message dated 7/18/99 11:08:08 PM EST, beth.fulton@marine.csiro.au
writes:
<<
Where the end point of ineffective fire is the absolute max range of
the
weapon and then the relative widths of each of the 3 bands depends on
the
shooter's quality - so really good guy would have longer point
blank/effective fire ranges whereas 'green' guys would have a much
longer
ineffective fire band (as their point blank/effective fire ones had
been
much contracted).
>>
I don't think you'll get excommunicated, but a thought about POINT BLANK
fire. target movement is much harder to keep up with as the target gets
CLOSER. A tiny twitch of the barrel targets somebody 300 yards out, but
you
might have to swing the muzzle through 180 degrees to cover someone 3
feet
away. Reaction time is the decision maker up close and personal. That
counts
in hand to hand as well: hence "telephone booth" karate techniques.