Prev: Re: M-16 Replacement (yet another Popular Mechanics article) Next: Re: DSII Force Configuration.

Re: DSII Force Configuration.

From: David <dluff@e...>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 10:44:48 -0400
Subject: Re: DSII Force Configuration.

My main battle tanks are either size 3 or 4, with a couple of 5's, but
my reconn and forward observers are size 1's.  Harder to hit but a
better chance to get in close for those arty strikes.  David

> Glover, Owen wrote:
> 
> Hi David, the real question is really what do you want your force to
> do? If recon is not an issue and the force primary role is to be
> assault then by all means an all Size 4 or 5 force would be the way to
> go. If you want a well rounded force then balance your vehicles to
> suit the tasking.
> 
> Then again if you wish to model on a 'real world' approach you will
> probably want to minimise the variations in vehicle chassis to
> simplify supply and maintenance.
> 
> Owen G
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David D. Taylor [mailto:dtaylor@pce.net]
> > Subject: DSII Force Configuration.
> >
> >
> SNIP
> 
> > size classes.  Would I be better of using a mix of tank sizes
> > from size 2
> > to 5 or is a force of all large tanks, like a Hammers Slammers
> force,
> > better?  Does anyone have any opinions on this issue?
> 
> SNIP


Prev: Re: M-16 Replacement (yet another Popular Mechanics article) Next: Re: DSII Force Configuration.