Re: Affectiveness of FSE BDN?
From: Alan E and Carmel J Brain <aebrain@d...>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 16:14:36 +1000
Subject: Re: Affectiveness of FSE BDN?
Beth Fulton wrote:
> You've also got to use that thrust of yours (they call it "Doing the
> Beth" down here) to keep in the opposition's blind spots and away from
> their SMs etc.
We normally play with cinematic movement. Under these circumstances,
getting on the opponent's 6 means you have to do a course something like
a ? in shape. You can't just "blow past" then spin in a parthian shot.
This means that after the SMLs have gone, the opponent slows down and
you get into a turning duel (with an opponent having 2-3 times your
firepower...).
When using cinematic movement, a 12" move means that the spread of
possible places (assuming a 4" manouver) can be 8-16" in a 45 degree
arc. Lots of opportunities to get the SMLs wrong. I've made up a
template, which I practice with, hence the high yield. I _could_ make it
100%, but in that case the SMLs would target the outer screen only. As
it is, with 85% I can often get a cruiser or two.
Naturally YMMV: Bigger fleets mean more targets, and often one squadron
will neatly dodge the SML field, only to have another blunder into it.
--
http://www2.dynamite.com.au/aebrain
aebrain@dynamite.com.au <> <> How doth the little Crocodile
| Alan & Carmel Brain| xxxxx Improve his shining tail?
| Canberra Australia | xxxxxHxHxxxxxx _MMMMMMMMM_MMMMMMMMM
abrain@cs.adfa.edu.au o O*OO^^^^OO*O o oo oo oo oo
By pulling MAERKLIN Wagons, in 1/220 Scale