Re: balancing Fighters

I like Tim's changes.

Tim Jones wrote:

> >I like fighters and don't see them as a problem.
>
> I agree the FB fighter rules are pretty cannonical IMO.
>
> >
> >The only quick change I can see to even things up is to allow
> >ships to fire their PDS at a range of 12"
> >at any fighters in range but must use a firecon to do so.
>
> I would just let PDS fire at any fighters in 6MU range
> and not require the ship to have an ADFC or the fighters to
> be attacking the ship, it can over-watch for any passing fighters
> and zap them as they pass. They don't need an FC for this as
> PDS is clearly stated as having an integral FC anyway.
>
> >
> >The main problem I have is fighters just going where they like
> >without having to be careful of enemy
> >ships.
>
> I agree allowing PDS to target any hostile fighter in range would be
> a good house rule.
>
> -= tim jones =-

--
Channing C. Faunce

channing@glasscity.net
http://www.glasscity.net/users/channing/index.html

Forge World saying: Never underestimate your enemy/food-souce.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Silent Death ships for sale outright or to trade for Full Thrust ships.
See my webpage for specifics.