Re: Fw: Carriers and other updates
From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 07:02:57 -0700
Subject: Re: Fw: Carriers and other updates
>>CVA.html
Mass factor seems to be off by a factor of 10.
>>CVL.html
Same comment.
>>CVE.html
>>DDV.html
These appear to be a more "wet navy" oriented carrier design, based upon
the primary armament being the fighters. Though from sheer mass, the
larger
ones could probably take some punishment, they wouls appear not to be
designed for the battle line.
I've actually been tempted to see if a design like this would stand up,
points wise, against a comperable force. Has anyone tried this?
Schoon