Prev: Re: Using FTFB interceptors Next: Re: [OT] Pages on Geocities

Re: Using FTFB interceptors (part 2)

From: Channing Faunce <channing@g...>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 16:07:38 -0400
Subject: Re: Using FTFB interceptors (part 2)

forgot to add the following to previous post:

Since it hasn't been changed in MT or FTFB I'd say it remains the same.

Chan Faunce

Tom McCarthy wrote:

> From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@aimnet.com>
>
> >A dogfight keeps going till one side decides to leave
> >and take the "parting shot" is how I read it.
> >
> >They can start the turn in dogfight status (if that's how they ended
last
> >turn) but then they adhere to the Fighter-toFighter Combat rules (FT
p.17).
> >
> >"...he may move his Group away provided it has not already moved that
turn;
> >if he does this, however, the attacking Group gets a free round of
attack
> >rolls before contact is broken."
>
> Which brings me back to the point of contention.  Can the attacking
Group
> follow (assuming it hasn't moved yet this turn) ?  Can it initiate
another
> dogfight ?  With the same group ?

Prev: Re: Using FTFB interceptors Next: Re: [OT] Pages on Geocities