RE: beam class sizes - smaller is better?
From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 10:59:36 +1000
Subject: RE: beam class sizes - smaller is better?
For a good practical example of the benefits & limitations of both
schools
of thought, check out the Gunslinger results:
http://users.mcmedia.com.au/~denian/ft/webgames/gunsling/
Personal commentary is included.
'Neath Southern Skies - http://users.mcmedia.com.au/~denian/
Commodore Alfred K Hole - RNS Indy's Folly [CB]
Captain Nicolette O'Teen - RNMS Golden Spear [CB]
EBD Medusa
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: Re: beam class sizes - smaller is better?
>
> Glen Bailey wrote:
> > I would think having a high thrust factor would mean you want
> > more little weapons. You can get in close and stay close
> > (a "knife" fight).
>
> On the other hand you're almost guaranteed to lose some of the Class-1
> batteries each treshold check... and it usually takes longer (or at
> least more DCP time) to repair two Class-1 than it does to repair one
> Class-4.
> > Can anyone with more experience give their views on big
> > beams vs more smaller beams?