Re: [FT] Sensor range question

On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Laserlight wrote:

> > > Maybe instead of +3", make it +10% of
> > > actual range?  Suggestions?
> >
> >that's a bit too complicated. why not +1 mu at 0-12, +2 mu at 12-24,
+3 at
> >24-36, etc? that range refers to the real, physical range.
> 
> Jeez, moving a decimal over one place is too complex?

moving a decimal place and then adding to the number you first thought
of,
ie 28" -> 2.8" -> 30.8". it's not that hard, but doing it every single
time i measure range? i suppose i'd get used to it. i'm just not keen on
all those extra digits.

Tom