RE: OU/NAC- Hawaii? Re: Achmaenid Persian Empire

> -----Original Message-----
> From: devans@uneb.edu [mailto:devans@uneb.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 1999 12:39 PM
> To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject: Re: OU/NAC- Hawaii? Re: Achmaenid Persian Empire
> 
> I find this a shocker. The ESU isn't attempting to crush 
> Japan imperialist
> tendencies? No matter WHO supports them?
> 
> *shrug* I know, if I want to know about this, sign up on the 
> 'pedia list.
> The FH has gotten even wierder than I feared.

Nah, they're too busy being imperialists (having just taken South Korea
and
parts of the CIS). <g>

The take over of Hawaii was more of an annexation than outright
invasion, as
the US was falling apart.
A large Japanese descended population and the promise of law and order
might
have made Japanese control attractive.	Of course, not _everyone_ will
like
it.

> 
> ***
> As for the Hawaiians - the Japanese-descended want to keep things as
> they are, many Native Hawaiians support the Bomb-throwing Sons of
> Kamehameha and want a union with the OU, and there are even 
> some USAians
> who want to go back to the Good Old Days and the old US 
> Constitution, or
> failing that, the NAC Successor State.
> ***
> 
> *whew* My sense of geopolitic, even in my backyard, is 
> obviously totally
> confused. Problem with having only been a tourist, obviously.
> 
> Thanks for the update.
> 
> The_Beast
> 
>