Re: Home Page Construction

Laserlight wrote:
> 
> >Let me guess... made with a MS product?
> 
> Nope.  Made with someone badly decaffeinated.  I write HTML by hand,
so to
> speak.

I use Netscape Gold 3.0 for the basis, then munge by hand. I really must
document the code too...

> Not MS's fault, except that when I previewed the page (IE4) everything
> looked okay.

I can't really blame MS for this. Sure IE4 "ignores" the lack of
</TABLE>  and therefore isn't compliant to the standard. But it's
noncompliant in a good way, tolerating faults and trying to do the best
job it can. Great in a browser, but absolutely the worst in a checker...

-- 
	      http://www2.dynamite.com.au/aebrain 
aebrain@dynamite.com.au     <> <>    How doth the little Crocodile
| Alan & Carmel Brain|	    xxxxx	Improve his shining tail?
| Canberra Australia |	xxxxxHxHxxxxxx _MMMMMMMMM_MMMMMMMMM
 abrain@cs.adfa.edu.au o O*OO^^^^OO*O o oo     oo oo	 oo  
		       By pulling MAERKLIN Wagons, in 1/220 Scale