Re: [SGII] Supression
From: "John M. Atkinson" <john.m.atkinson@e...>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 00:53:25 -0500
Subject: Re: [SGII] Supression
Allan Goodall wrote:
> I can agree with your line of reasoning on this. One thing, though. I
don't
> think it should count for a unit "in position". This represents a unit
still
> in firing capability but protecting themselves. You MIGHT not want to
give
> them the In Position die shift, but I feel you should not treat them
as Major
> Successes automatically.
Yipe! Good call.
John M. Atkinson