Re: [FTFB] Not ships, exactally. . .

>[John's nifty defsats]
>
>I hadn't thought of going this small with defasts. Not a bad idea.
>However, if they are unmanned, they should have some limitations -
>disruptable by ECM, beam range bands of 10" instead of 12", Die rolls
at
>-1, or something like that. IF they are manned, they certainly won't be
>jobs of choice for the military.

I can see disruption by ECM, but can't figure reduced die rolls or
range band reductions. PSB expansion please?  :-)

Mk
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Only the bravest try where eagles and angels dare to fly
<*>