Re: Manuever warfare was:Anti-Tank guns
From: DracSpy@a...
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 20:07:14 EST
Subject: Re: Manuever warfare was:Anti-Tank guns
In a message dated 99-02-11 14:30:07 EST, you write:
<< 1. The US Army says they are proponents of Maneuver Warfare but the
actual mechanics are really thinly veiled attrition based warfare.
(Personally I think one should read USMC FMFM-1 Warfighting. They've
got
a better grasp.)
****
I think that I have read that, I have read most of the FMs that you can
get
with out enlisting, for anyone that uses armour I would sigest reading
all of
the FM-17-xx manuals, very interesting.
****
2. Artillery or fire support. Well it's really not much support at all.
The redlegs have developed their own thing which does little to support
joe schmoe the tanker or infantryman. (Note that Airforce CAS is no
better. They control their own CAS that's why the USMC has the best
system) FS requests has become such a mysterious art form that only
arty guys can do it. The problem is the artillery is much more
interested in fighting their own battle (the deep interdiction thing
ala
the artillery raids and MLRS raids of Desert Storm, than they are with
finding time to provide fire support for infantry platoons and
companies. This has been a complaint in combat arms for a little while
now. Every branch is always trying to prove how they have the biggest
dick (ask John the engineer <grin>), and this is the artillery
branches
way of doing it.
****
That can be a probem for the ground pounders and tread heads.
****
3. A lot of future doctrinal policy is validated through simulations
but
Army simulations are flawed due to the utter lack of modeling for lack
of a better term "morale". Sort of what I was going into before. He
devotes a couple chapters to this.
****
Maybe the use hipnotic sigesting to give there units super high misshion
modivashion.
****
4. Many wrong or incomplete lessons were drawn from Desert Storm in an
attempt to validate the DOD and the US Army's current warfighting
doctrine. Despite the overwhelming success a lot of stuff was screwed
up. (One of the biggest being the primacy of air power in all
situations....)
****
Desert Storm was a walk in the park with a L7A3 and someone with a 1"
knive
trying to mug you, not all that dificult, I know that ~400 people were
killed
in action, but cositering what they did that is not very many people, I
don't
think that any would cound have done better.
*****
Anyway it's been several years since I read it but those are a few
issues.
Los >>
One of the things that I addressed with the Arty and Air support is
having
them at the company level, each company has 4 Attack helos and 2 Med
MRLS
launchers, that should make getting supporting arty much easer.
-Stephen