Re: hello

Thomas Anderson wrote:

> fair enough. i get the impression ADFC/PDS provides much more
effective
> area-defence than the old ADAF.

Concur.

> i appreciate this now; the fact that SMs require a different defensive
> approach to beams/torps is not a bad thing; it's a good thing - it
means
> one shp / fleet / tactic will never work for all enemies.

Agree completely.

> every time i think i've seen a flaw, i look again and either it's
> been fixed or i realise my assumptions were wrong. still, it's been in
> development since 1973, no?

Right. And still a "work in progress", but the FB1 design system seems
about as balanced as its possible to get.

-- 
aebrain@dynamite.com.au     <> <>    How doth the little Crocodile
| Alan & Carmel Brain|	    xxxxx	Improve his shining tail?
| Canberra Australia |	xxxxxHxHxxxxxx _MMMMMMMMM_MMMMMMMMM
 abrain@cs.adfa.oz.au  o OO*O^^^^O*OO o oo     oo oo	 oo  
		    By pulling MAERKLIN Wagons, in 1/220 Scale