Re: [FT] Missiles, Salvo and Capital.
From: Alan E & Carmel J Brain <aebrain@d...>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 23:46:22 +1000
Subject: Re: [FT] Missiles, Salvo and Capital.
Oerjan Ohlson wrote:
> I submit that the extra range and (particularly) the ability of the MT
> missiles to attack other targets than the closest one compensates for
the
> slightly reduced damage compared to the SMs :-/
Concur.
In addition, there's a synergy, much like that between Fighters/SMs. 6
SMs may not overwhelm 20 or so ADAFs, but 4 SMs and 4 MTMs may well do,
specially if the latter can be EMPs.... add fighters as well, and things
get very difficult for the defence.
--
aebrain@dynamite.com.au <> <> How doth the little Crocodile
| Alan & Carmel Brain| xxxxx Improve his shining tail?
| Canberra Australia | xxxxxHxHxxxxxx _MMMMMMMMM_MMMMMMMMM
abrain@cs.adfa.oz.au o OO*O^^^^O*OO o oo oo oo oo
By pulling MAERKLIN Wagons, in 1/220 Scale