Re: [FT-AAR] comment NAC/NI AAR
From: "Oerjan Ohlson" <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 19:16:27 +0100
Subject: Re: [FT-AAR] comment NAC/NI AAR
MWS wrote:
> > If you let the "heavy" modification apply to the re-rolls, I'd up
the
> > cost to at least +36 pts per heavy squadron. That's a lot, but it is
>
> We had some discussion over Heavy fighters a few weeks ago >
concerning
"Class 1
I know. I voted on it, too.
> PDS". The consensus was to apply the game effects literally, ie:
>
> "rolls of "4" have no effect when under PDAF/ADAF or Fighter weapons
> fire."
>
> Applying this also affects any rerolls, since that still classifies as
PDS
> fire.
The re-roll rule wasn't discussed, however. It is the "treat them as if
they had level-1 screens" problem again - screens do not normally modify
re-rolls. And it does have a certain effect on how the heavy fighters
should be priced, though not as much as I panicked yesterday :-7
More on this in another post, though.
Oerjan Ohlson
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com
"Life is like a sewer.
What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
- Hen3ry