Re: [FT] Fighter Launch Variant (Was Really Big Ships...) Snip when commenting :)
From: Alan E & Carmel J Brain <aebrain@d...>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 22:17:33 +1000
Subject: Re: [FT] Fighter Launch Variant (Was Really Big Ships...) Snip when commenting :)
Denny Graver wrote:
>
> Another option is to break the mass used for hangar bays down into two
> parts, launch bay and hangar. The current mass for a fighter bay is
9pt
> (Fleet book)
>
> Hangar 6 Mass
> Launch Bay 3 Mass
I agree in principle, but suggest 6 mass for a Hanger, and 6 for a
launch bay.
Up to 1 external "inflatable" hanger per ship can be bought for 9, which
has cradles instead of a launch tube.
This way, BDNs with 1 Fighter sqdrn launch 1 with mass 9 (external
rack), SDNs with 2 fighters launch 1 with 2 hangers and 1 tube at a cost
of 18, Light carriers launch 2 with 4 hangers, for a cost of 36, and
only the large carriers get a waste of 6 pts (and maybe should get
another fighter...)
--
aebrain@dynamite.com.au <> <> How doth the little Crocodile
| Alan & Carmel Brain| xxxxx Improve his shining tail?
| Canberra Australia | xxxxxHxHxxxxxx _MMMMMMMMM_MMMMMMMMM
abrain@cs.adfa.oz.au o OO*O^^^^O*OO o oo oo oo oo
By pulling MAERKLIN Wagons, in 1/220 Scale