Re: [FT] SMLs, Type 3 & Tactics
From: Charles Choukalos <chuckc@b...>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:16:25 -0500
Subject: Re: [FT] SMLs, Type 3 & Tactics
Well, definately a lot of neat ideas/opinions. Although I guess I'm the
extreamist in the group. I agree that sml's need to overwhelm your
opponents to be effective. However I've been playing with the cinematic
movement rules. They don't allow you to pass your opponent and just
rotate to face... instead you've got to turn. Usually plays havoc with
your weaponry. I usually find that class-1 beams usually end up acting
as second rate pds systems in most of my battles. Typically you need
class-3 beams to really effectively hit your opponent most of the time.
However reading bob's post about his opponent John, I found it
interesting that you stuck with the rather lame amount of sml's / ship
that the FB uses, and instead made up by using class-3 beams. I
typically found that my opponent, who after getting throughly trashed a
couple o'times by my sml fleets, started getting his speed/pds/adfc
systems a higher priority. Typically my missle ships are packed to the
gills with sml's. Small ships have 2 sml's and larger ships have 4-5
sml's /each. I tyipcally though stick with only 2 rounds of sml fire.
Sometimes I sub in ER sml rounds in some of my larger ships which have
at
most 3 rounds of normal sml fire. I work on the strike hard and fast in
an overwhelming manner and then flee if they're not dead yet.
Addressing John C, regarding Agesis ships... my opponent ( mark ) has
really gotten into this. His tactics, are tyipcally 4 pds/large ship.
2+ on his smaller ships. However he usually has 2 class-1's or so/ship
that act as additional pds. Many of his cruiser+ ships have adfc to
help
others that are under attack. He does have one stand out ship agesis
ship.... I'm not sure what the specs are... but its:
light cruiser ( fairly cheap )
thrust - 6
screen-1 or about 3 pts of armor.... ( he keeps going back and forth on
this )
adfc, 12 pds,
I think its about hull 44 or 48 and its around 160 pts or so.
Its really effective in the center of a fleet. And let me tell you 12
pds at range 3" can scrap a destroyer...
Typically though mark has switched tactics in light of my rapidly
changing fleet compositions. He's gone to a lot of thrust-2/4 large
ships with some small screening frigates/destroyers. He keeps them all
closely grouped within 6" or so under each others adfc coverage. He
loads each large ship with 4 pds, 2 class-1 beams or so. Most of the
small ships have 2+pds. He usually has 1 agesis light cruiser somewhere
in the mix. All of his large ships use adfc. The result has been quite
impressive. Typically you're sml's go for the little ships that are out
front in a screening role. The massed afdc pds/class-1 fire power of
the
tightly packed formation means that a lot of sml's vaporise before they
hit the small ships. Mark typically allocates about 3 pds + 1 class-1 /
ship for defensive fire/sml salvo. Tyipcally this stops the salvo.
Usually I lose a good 1/3 of my sml fire of a combined fleet. A mixed
sml fleet wouldn't get through this probably... I wouldn't have enough
sml's to do the job.
Oh...... Bob, getting back to your Rhomaioi missle ships. It seems to
me
that you don't pack the ship with launchers but more missle carrying
capacity and beams. Kinda the way that the fleet book works. Have you
experimented with serious massed sml fire power? I think I posted some
of my free cal-tex designs previously. I have a kenedy class missle
cruiser ( a mass 90 ca ) with 4 smls ( I had a math error previously and
had 5 sml's in it... whoops. ). Its very effective. I also have a
light
cruiser that's got 4 sml's but nada for defenses or beam armement. I
guess I swing to 1 extreame or the other. I agree with the fighters
being a good complement to sml's... they're quite effective for
overwhelming the defenses. Do you find that your beams are used a lot
in
your sml fleets?
Chuck