Prev: Re: [OT] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the structure Next: RE: [SG2] Vehicle Questions...

Re: [SG2] Vehicle Questions...

From: John Leary <john_t_leary@p...>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 16:47:00 -0800
Subject: Re: [SG2] Vehicle Questions...

Allan Goodall wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 05 Jan 1999 15:39:40 -0800, John Leary
<john_t_leary@pronetusa.net>
> wrote:
> 
> >The thing that needs to be resolved in
> >this case is: What is PA?
> >	If PA is infantry, treat it as infantry.   If PA is a vehicle/s,
> >treat it as a vehicle/s.
> 
> Well, it's Powered Armour... it's infantry in big suits.
> 
> The problem, as Tom pointed out, is that the system doesn't handle
multiple
> Support Weapons well... This is definitely a failing of the system.
> 
> Allan Goodall 		 agoodall@interlog.com

     To restate the case, or use a different point of view:

If PA is infantry, then it should use an infantry TOE and will not
have multiple support weapons in the unit.   Problem solved!

If PA is armor, then each PA trooper is 'driving' a one man armored
vehicle, and has a main weapon on the vehicle that can be fired at
any selected target.   Each trooper/vehicle can fire on any available
target in range, and each attack is a seperate attack from a different
vehicle in the unit.   Problem solved!

I fully realize the heritical nature of the concept: PA is a vehicle.
If the PA fits, drive it.

:-)
Bye for now,
John L.


Prev: Re: [OT] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the structure Next: RE: [SG2] Vehicle Questions...