Prev: Re: [FT][SG][DS] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the structure Next: Re: United States attitudes towards guns and governments

Re: [OT] Stupid Military Terminology Question

From: John Leary <john_t_leary@p...>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 19:14:30 -0800
Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid Military Terminology Question

John C
...snip...JTL
> All I really want is a generic term for an individual vehicle or
> squad--I'd just use "vehicle" if it weren't for those pesky squads of
> infantry--that I can use to designate them in the rules.  I'm using
Unit
> to designate a group of tanks (or whatever) that all move at the same
> time.  "Good Guy" is not a bad idea, and I now have something to fall
> back upon, but I would like something a little more formal.
> 
> By the way: Thank you all for the responses.	I assumed that everyone
> was off on vacation, since the list has been so slow for the past
week.
> Apparently, I was wrong....
> 
> John Crimmins
> john1x@hotmail.com
> 
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

     How about 'figures', or 'miniatures'.

Bye for now,
John L.


Prev: Re: [FT][SG][DS] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the structure Next: Re: United States attitudes towards guns and governments