Re: Time to speak of many... Re: Gas Skimmers, Wings and Things

devans@uneb.edu aka The Beast wrote:

[snip]

>I'd consider increasing the hull integrity. If operations in the
atmosphere
>are that dangerous, I think they want something that could withstand a
>"bump" or two.

>You ain't lied yet, bro. Though the term weak hull doesn't necessarily
mean
>unable to take punishment, I'd be assuming at least the cabin would be
>built like a brick s**t house (crude American aphorism that I've heard
at
>least three Brits use).

What I meant by this was the damage track:

>Damage Track: 4; [o/o/o/*]

1 hit and it takes a threshold, which could be catastrophic if something
important "gives."

Schoon